Is there a different G-D of the Old Testament than the New? Does G-D change? Is the Father always angry? Is the Old Testament only law and the New Testament all Grace? How does the Old Testament connect to the New Testament?
I started to do a book review of Walter Kaiser Jr’s book “Recovering the Unity of the Bible: One Continuous Story, Plan, and Purpose” in a few of previous blogs http://smoothcookies.wordpress.com/2011/04/17/notes-on-recovering-the-unity-of-the-bible-by-walter-c-kaiser-jr/, http://smoothcookies.wordpress.com/2011/04/22/notes-on-introduction-of-kaisers-recovering-the-unity-of-the-bible/, and http://smoothcookies.wordpress.com/2011/04/30/notes-on-introduction-continued-of-kaiser%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9crecovering-the-unity-of-the-bible%e2%80%9d/. Unfortunately, I never was able to finish through the process. Kaiser Jr’s book I believe heads in the direction of more unity between the Old Testament and New Testament that I would take, however, he probably would not come to all the same conclusions.
As I had mentioned in previous blogs, the Old Testament, if studied at all, is given a negative connotation. I believe this is the case because so few actually read it in the first place but if they do it is through the lenses of replacement theology. It is seen to be done away with. Jesus has come and fulfilled all. Therefore none of it stands. The struggle I have here is that Yeshua uses the Old Testament to fight off the devil’s temptations in Matthew 4:1-11, to tell people how they should live in Mark 10, and even the greatest commandments in Mark 12:33 pulling from Deuteronomy 6:5 and Leviticus 19:18.
Furthermore, Paul is constantly quoting from the Old Testament to proof his points and show how a Christian ought to live, along with the other writers of the New Testament. In fact Paul even tells Timothy, in 2 Timothy 3:16, 17, that “16 All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness ; 17 so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work. ” Notice that Paul says “ALL”, not just the New Testament.
Moreover, in this particular scripture, a strong case could be made that 2 Timothy 3:16 is actually only referring to the Old Testament http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible. When Yeshua and the Apostles walked the roads of Jerusalem, there was no New Testament writings at this time. Most scholars would put the first writing of the New Testament around 49 to 51 C.E., with the books of Galatians or First Thessalonians http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Testament. Nonetheless, I do believe the New Testament to be inspired by G-D just the same from further research. The point I was trying to make, however, was that the Old Testament would have been the Scriptures the early believers used.
I recently started reading Derek Leman’s book “A New Look at the Old Testament”. I believe gives a great list of what is often thought of the Old Testament on page 3.
1. It is not as relevant to our modern situation because it was before the cross.
2. It is boring and too difficult to understand.
3. God is usually mad in the Old Testament and not very pleasant compared to God in the New Testament.
4. The commandments in the Old Testament are burdensome because God designed them to show Israel they could not keep the law.
5. It was written mostly to prepare the way for the New Testament and the Messiah, so it has for the most part been replaced by the better testament.
6. It is the Word of God because it shows the history of G0d’s dealings with man, but for the most part its rules are outdated.
Leman goes on to show some reasons why we should read the Old Testament on page 4, with “some surprising truths about the Old Testament that should get any follower of Jesus excited about reading it:”
1. Almost every truth of the New Testament was already present in the Old Testament. Very little is new in the New Testament.
2. The Old Testament has information about God’s attributes in much greater detail than the New Testament.
3. The Old Testament was the book of Jesus and the apostles. They spoke about it constantly and memorized large portions of it. When they spoke of the necessity of knowing the Bible, they were referring to the Old Testament.
4. The Old Testament is filled with statements about God’s favor for the undeserving (grace) and upholds love as the highest standard.
5. The Old Testament has more to say about prayer and worship than the New Testament.
6. The New Testament writers assume a thorough knowledge of the Old Testament. Lack of Old Testament knowledge is the greatest reason people fail to understand the New Testament properly.
As you can see, there is much to learn from the Old Testament. Another book that started my shift in thinking that all the Old Testament was not outdated was Daniel Thomas Lancaster’s book “Restoration: Returning the Torah of GOD to the Disciples of Jesus”. He brings the difficult commandments of G-D into a new light. However, I will forewarn that it may seem that he is making the case that all gentiles should obey the law the same as Jews in the book, however, he has come to believe in what FFOZ’s ministry calls the ”Divine Invitation”. They do not believe the Sign Commandments of the Old Testament are mandatory for Gentiles but are for the Jews. Although, FFOZ would say that gentiles have an invitation to keep as many of the sign commandments as they feel comfortable doing. They have a series of blogs more defining their position at http://ffoz.org/cgi-bin/MT4/mt-search.cgi.
Another item that I started to learn from Lancaster’s book “Restoration” is about the Oral Torah/Laws of the Jewish people. I think this is an important item to get when reading the New Testament. Too many times when Christians read anything in the New Testament speaking about law/commandments/man’s traditions; they automatically think that this is referring to the Old Testament commandments of Moses. This always behooved me because if you read the Old Testament, it is always the L-RD telling Moses what to instruct the people. The commandments are not ultimately from Moses nor man.
So, if you are saying Jesus did away with anything His Father commanded in the Old Testament, you are pitting the Son against the Father, in what I can see. This is one of the reasons that Messianic Judaism brings continuity to the Old Testament because they’re able to look at the passages of Acts 15 and 21, and see that there is a continuance of these things in the Jewish life. As Yeshua says in Matthew 5:17-18:
17 “Do not think that I came to abolish the Lawor the Prophets ; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill. 18 “For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished.”
Yeshua did fulfill many promises of the Old Testament as the Messiah and to cover our sins, which John defines sin not as the Law but the breaking of the law, in 1 John 3:4-6:
4 Everyone who practicessinalsopracticeslawlessness ; and sin is lawlessness. 5 You know that He appeared in order to takeawaysins ; and in Him there is nosin. 6 No*one who abides in Him sins ; no*one who sins has seen Him orknows Him.
Furthermore, please take notice that Yeshua fulfilled the law and there is no sin in Him. He lived a perfect life and died for the sins of many! Hebrews 9:27-28 states, “27 And inasmuch *as it is appointed for men to die once and after this comes judgment, 28 so Christ also, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time for salvation without reference to sin, to those who eagerly await Him.”
This is not saying that we now live in anarchy and have no guide whatsoever of how we should live but that Yeshua was the perfect sacrifice without blemish to bear the penalty for our sins once and for all. No animal sacrifice ever could take away the sins of man nor any works could justify anyone ever. However, by faith by grace, we were created to walk in good works!
Accordingly both gifts and sacrifices are offered which cannot make the worshiper perfect in conscience, 10 since they relate only to food and drink and various washings, regulations for the body imposed until a time of reformation. 11 But when Christ appeared as a high priest of the good things to come, He entered through the greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this creation ; 12 and not through the blood of goats and calves, but through His own blood, He entered the holy place once for all, having obtained eternal redemption. 13 For if the blood of goats and bulls and the ashes of a heifer sprinkling those who have been defiled sanctify for the cleansing of the flesh, 14 how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without blemish to God, cleanse your conscience from dead works to serve the living God ? Hebrews 9:9-14
8 For by grace you have been saved through faith ; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God ; 9 not as a result of works, so that no one may boast. 10 For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand so that we would walk in them. Ephesians 2:8-10
You see…. in realizing the distinction of the Church and Israel, how the law applies to both, who Jesus is, who Paul is, and our roles, it brings clarity to how G-D is diverse but ONE, we are diverse but ONE new man, we have many roles to edify and complement the ONE body, and there are many stories and testaments but ONE Bible!!! ONE Story!!! ONE Purpose!!!
Before I kind of went on a rabbit trail, I was making the point that it helps the Christian to realize that the Jewish people, that the scriptures came through, had traditions other than the Writing Word of G-D in the Old Testament. Lancaster writes on page 133 of “Restoration”:
In addition, it is helpful to look at Jewish tradition around a commandment. The Jewish community has more than 3,000 years of experience in handling the Torah and applying its laws. Oftentimes the rabbis see far deeper into the text than our cursory readings allow. They bring a wealth of oral tradition and family history to help clarify difficult passages.
Lancaster goes on to say on page 135 of “Restoration”, “Thus traditional Judaism has two Torahs: the written Torah and the oral Torah.” Furthermore, he starts to define the Oral Torah/Law on page 135:
The oral Torah is a collection of laws, explanations and legal minutia. Allegedly, the Jewish people orally passed these laws on from the days of Moses until the second century CE when they were finally committed to writing. The written code of this vast body of traditional law is called the Mishnah.
Lancaster goes on in Chapter 13 to speak about the Mishnah, the Talmud, and passages in the New Testament that may refer to these traditions that are not in the Old Testament like Mark 7. The oral Torah is similar to modern-day Bible Commentaries by Christian theologians. We take what they say to get further clarification and study of the written Scriptures but by no means are they the same as the Written, Inspired authority of the Word of G-D. However, we still need to be aware of it because these first century Jewish authors of the New Testament certainly would have assumed their audiences knew of these oral traditions, as well.
As for the false belief that the Old Testament is all “Law” and the New Testament is all “Grace”, Herman Bavinick’s ”Reformed Dogmatics: Holy Spirit, Church, and New Creation Volume Four” broke down my misconception of this thinking. This was one of the books required when taking the Doctrine of Church in seminary. Like always I don’t come all his conclusions, however, he made me think of this dichotomy. For example on page 452 Bavinick writes of Paul:
he acknowledges that the law-centered dispensation by no means snuffed out the promise already made to Abraham (Gal. 3:17, 21), that the gospel was also preached in the days of the old covenant (Gal. 3:8), and that in those days, too, righteousness was obtained from and by faith (Rom. 4:11-12; 11:32; Gal. 3:6-7).
Furthermore, Bavinick writes on page 454, “ The gospel always presupposes the law and also needs it in its administration.” This is the promises that G-D gave to Abraham preceded the law given to the people of Israel through Moses. The promises to Abraham were to the physical heirs through Isaac but also all of the Nations, which would further be clarified that believe in Yeshua as their L-RD and Savior. However, the covenant given to Israel through Moses were given directly to the nation of Israel. Derek Leman writes, “The covenant which gentiles are included in is the “covenant of promise” (vs. 12) and not the “covenant of law” — Abrahamic, not Sinai.” (http://www.derekleman.com/musings/2012/01/06/answering-peter/#more-4875)
All these studies started to help me see the connection of G-D’s Word and People. Messianic Judaism’s distinction between Israel and the Church is one of the keys to seeing this unity. Furthermore, to see this distinction, it is paramount to understand the ministry of Paul and Peter/James/John. Dispensationalists are close but are not the same on the view of the Law, Paul, and how it is applied as Messianic Judaism. A good view of a Progressive Dispensationalists on this is Tom Pennington’s three sermons on “The Church in God’s Eternal Plan” under his Systematic Theology series at http://www.countrysidebible.org/CBC.php?t=23&series=9&seriesT=Systematic+Theology.
I pray that we do not fall back into the heresy of Marcion way back in 140 CE. He rejected the Old Testament entirely, the book of Matthew, Mark, Acts, and Hebrews because he believed these writings “favored Jewish readers”. (page 62, 63, “Church History in Plain Language” by Bruce L. Shelley. Church History really helps in seeing how things are shaped in thought and practice in the people of G-D. Tommy Nelson, a Dispensationalists, has a great series on Church History at http://dbcmedia.org/sermons/church-history-the-footprints-of-god-volume-1-of-2/?st=shopp&s=chruch%20history2. Of course, he puts some of his theological distinctives into the sermons but you can still gain a lot of knowledge on church history through them. Plus, he is a pretty entertaining speaker to listen to.
When the books of the Old Testament got dubbed “Old”, I do not know. However, I do not believe Yeshua or the Apostles would have made this dichotomy of G-D’s Word between the Old and New Testament. The Old Testament is the Hebrew Bible. It is the TaNaK. “The Torah (“Teaching”, also known as the Five Books of Moses), Nevi’im (“Prophets”) and Ketuvim (“Writings”)—hence TaNaKh.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanakh)
Furthermore, a better name for the New Testament may be the Apostolic Scriptures. A continuance of the Hebrew testament and story of G-D, the Messiah, and His people. To continue on with the theme of this Messianic series of a diverse unity. One Bible with many authors and books. One Story with many chapters, characters, and parts played.
In my next post in this series, it is my hope to cover the Biblical Holidays and Eschatology (a study of the end times).
Grace and peace be with you,
In Yeshua Messiah,
Coley
