Chaim Potok’s book, “The Promise”, conjured up several thoughts as I read the book. I’ve listed a few below.
Selfishness
One of the biggest things that this book made me think about was how selfish I am. I hate to be inconvenienced. I do not want to be bothered by other people’s problems too much. Not liking confrontation just may be an excuse to stay in my own little world.
Reuven never seemed to be annoyed to be inconvenienced besides maybe a couple of times with Rav Kalman. He was willing to just sit and listen to Michael or spend time with him. He was willing to talk to his best friend’s fiance, whom he used to date. He was there for his dad. He was there for Abraham and Ruth Gordon. He really seemed to have a love for people, which sadly I do not believe I’ve been too good in this area.
He lived out 1 Corinthians 12:16 in this book, which states, “If one member suffers, all suffer together; if one member is honored, all rejoice together.” Which, he even rejoiced when the time came with his father hugging and dancing in the hall, along with dancing with Danny at his wedding. Not to say living out 1 Corinthians 13. Wow, you would think his teacher was the Apostle Paul!
Scholar
Another thought this book kept me thinking about was being a scholar. It definitely made me want to be a scholar even more. Reuven is a scholar. His best friend, Danny, is a scholar. Reuven’s dad is a scholar. Danny’s dad is a scholar. Michael’s parents are scholars. Rav Kalman, Rav Gershenson, and other scholars were mentioned. This was like a drama of scholars, indeed.
I thought how cool it would be to have so many friends that are scholars.
Authority of Scripture~Oral Tradition (Mishnah, Talmud)
The authority of scripture and the oral tradition are hit on in this book. Potok left it open whether Reuven would use his hermeneutic method on the Prophets and Writings. Even though, I liked Reuven’s character more in the story, I would probably have to agree with Rav Kalman on that one. I wouldn’t want to mess with the Torah, Prophets, Writings, and would have to go a step further to include the Apostolic scripture in there. I do not know enough Hebrew or Greek to do any of the methods he speaks of anyway, but it does sound dangerous. Someday, I do hope to learn Hebrew, Greek, and even Latin possibly.
I’ve never got to the point to holding any of the oral law as authoritative but only informative to me so far. I do think it is helpful to learning the culture, traditions, and settings. A lot to learn, yet.
Being at Peace with Yourself
Being at peace with myself might have been one of the biggest things I thought about as I read through this book. It is wild that I was pretty solid and have remained solid by the grace of G-D on many central things of my faith in Yeshua for several years. In the past year and a half, this Hebrew Roots/Messianic movement has made me at war within over the so-called ceremonial laws of the Tanach or sign laws.
Reuven was at war over different hermeneutics, new vs old, and more liberal vs orthodox. In the last couple of years, I can really relate to this. It is amazing how paralyzed you become when you’re not at peace with G-D and with yourself. It is hard to work in ministry or be of any good to the body of Messiah, family, or friends.
But I feel like my pendulum swing in this area is slowing and I am finding more stability and direction into where I need to go. Which, I believe is trying to connect with more community in a church while still keeping ahold of some of the new Torah laws that have become beautiful to me and continuing to study the Hebrew Roots. We will see where Adonai leads me:)
Swaying between Doctrines~Continuing to Learn Truth
This last thought that stuck with me is probably the toughest for me. How do you not sway between Doctrines, as in Ephesians 4:13-15, 1 Timothy, and Titus mention, while still continuing to learn truth. We have so many teachers in the world now, with so many different views and methods. Not to say, an overload of information on the internet. And everyone is a teacher in the Hebrew Roots movement with a wide array of views. When the Protestants broke off from the Catholics, this seems to continue to break into thousands and thousands of pieces.
How do you define this sound doctrine? All the sides will say the only problem with the other’s side is THE BIBLE! They’re all using the same book but with different hermeneutics or interpretative methods.
It seems like the only way to stay sound is pick a camp and refuse to study all sides and never admit you’re ever wrong. Would sound doctrine be the oldest, the most material, most popular, or perhaps whatever you like? Does this cut out learning anything new, admitting your wrong on some things, or even worse denying that the Holy Spirit can reveal new things?
Maybe, it is talking about battling over things that we will just not know until Yeshua comes back. Maybe we can just call it immaturity but does that mean we’re not mature until we line up with the doctrines of Mormons, Jehovah Witness, Roman Catholics, Baptists, Pentecostals, Two House, One Torah, Divine Invitation, Bi-lateral Ecclesiology, or whatever other camps are out there.
“As a Driven Leaf” by Milton Steinberg kind of hits on this, also. One character said that sometimes what he thinks is changed depending on whatever the last book is that he read. It seems like the same thing can happen to us today with whatever teacher is the last we listened to or read. “Well they are making a lot of sense.” “They’re making a lot of sense, too.”
Then, it comes down to the cross-examination and continued studying until you become confident where you stand. But what if you continue to study and find out more information that sways your mind back to the other side like Reuven revealed in his smicha examinations that he had seen a variation in another edition.
As page 333 reads:
“The Napoli Edition of the Mishnah,” Rav Kalman repeated, staring at me. His entire world of learning was being challenged. All the mental gymnastics to which he would have subjected that passage of Talmud had been turned into smoke by a variant reading found in a fifteenth-century edition of the Mishnah. (“The Promise” by Chaim Potok, page 333)
Would not most Christians world be turned upside down, if they actually started to study the Greek and see that Mark 7:19 does not include the actual words, “Thus He declared all foods clean,” as taught on page 99 in Hope Egan’s book “Holy Cow! Does GOD care about what we eat?” with D. Thomas Lancaster contributing “Man Alive! There’s More!”
Or perhaps studying the book of Hebrews in some of the English translations and finding out that the original manuscripts added the word “covenant” in a few places. Or maybe we go on a myth rampage, which I still do not know where some of the sources come from that these teachers get to tie Bible verses together with certain myths, pagan customs, or traditions over thousands of years. So now, we have to grudge through tons of material trembling as we walk out the front door or perhaps with our chest a mile in front of us. So much for sola scriptura. haha.
Well, I do not mean to discourage. It is just a struggle that I’ve had as being someone who continues to like to dig, just can’t back away from studying all sides, and as much as I hate it usually having to admit I’m wrong sometimes.
In the end, I have come to the conclusion that I must seek good teachers of good character first. Teachers balanced, peaceful, loving, honest, and seem to be full of the fruit of the Spirit. It may mean submitting or at least not rocking the boat on things I disagree on sometimes. To strive to continue learning peacefully, patiently, and with perseverance, awaiting the return of Messiah Yeshua. Perhaps 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1-3 are the best criteria to use in their whole context, especially Titus 2.
Shalom and grace be with you,
In Messiah Yeshua,
Coley